Why should taxpayers be responsible for your unicorn research?*

What my relatives think my job is like | Image by Anley Piers and Faery Sola on Flickr

What my relatives think my job is like | Image by Anley Piers and Faery Sola on Flickr

My advisor was in the news recently talking about a cool project our lab is working on. The piece did a great job of laying out some of the practical applications of the project, so I sent it around to some of my relatives. One of my aunts, who used to be an out and out climate change denier but whose position now seems to be more that “climate might be changing now, but humans aren’t at fault,” responded with something that really hurt me:

You could not get away with not believing in climate change and be in the program you are in and have her for an advisor.

My advisor doesn’t do the work she does because of climate change, but my aunt is absolutely right – I couldn’t get a job with her if I didn’t believe in climate change. And not just her – I’d be hard pressed to find an advisor anywhere in the world who would take me. Just as I’d have the same problem if I argued that evolution didn’t happen or that the Grand Canyon was created during Noah’s flood or man never landed on the moon. It’s hard to get a job doing science if you can’t demonstrate at least a basic understanding of physics, chemistry, and biology and the ability to evaluate evidence in your field.

But science isn’t an ossified, organized beast. It’s a growing, evolving, tangled thing. I absolutely do not hold the same views on everything as my advisor or other scientists – scientists spend a great deal of our time arguing. We love proving each other wrong, are frustrated and delighted when the data prove our own hypotheses wrong, and are endlessly curious about how the world works. I mean, we aren’t infallible. There are absolutely cases of scientific fraud or plain old stupid mistakes. But most of us are trying damn hard to do a good job.

As far as climate change goes, we know that higher levels of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide keep heat from the sun’s heat from leaving the earth. We’ve understood this since the late 1800s. Plants take in CO2 and turn it into leaves and wood and such. If conditions are right, dead plants turn into fossil fuels over millions of years. We dug a hell of a lot of it out of the ground and burned it back to CO2. Thus, an increase in the average global temperature.

I get angry when people deny that climate change is happening. I’m not angry at my aunt – I’m angry that money and general human psychology makes it so hard for people to respond to slow, long term disasters. I’m angry about false equivalence in journalism that confuses the general public about climate change. I’m angry that weather will become more extreme throughout my lifetime and that it will make the world a more difficult place to live in. I’m angry that all my research has to be filtered through the lens of climate change because the climate has already begun changing and it makes my questions harder to answer. I’m angry that my grandparents’ and parents’ generation hasn’t worked harder to reduce CO2 emissions, since the resilient, walkable, energy efficient cities we need to build to avoid/slow/adapt toclimate change would improve quality of life and the environment even if climate change wasn’t already happening. I’m angry that thousands of scientists can spend lifetimes studying and explaining climate change instead of the millions of other interesting things there are to research because they care about the world and the people in it –  and that a good chunk of the US public is still convinced it’s a hoax.

The last few paragraphs are pretty much what I fired off to my aunt when I got her email. Usually I try to be all calm and reasonable and, you know, like a scientist. But I’ve been working hard lately and I’m tired. I’m doing difficult, highly skilled work for a smidge above minimum wage because I believe that the world is a beautiful and interesting place and I want to understand it and make it better. And it makes me feel awful that there are people – many of them people I know and love – who believe that the work I do is irrelevant, useless, or even imaginary.

* No offense intended to anyone studying mythology. I’d love to read your papers.

While you’re waiting for the bus

Sort of weekly list of stuff interesting enough I think it’s worth sharing.

Tuesday shoesday – Migraine fashion edition

Do you think these shades

Therespecs migraine glasses - designed to fit over normal glasses

Theraspecs migraine shades

would go with these shoes?

Camilla Skovgaard at gravitypope

Camilla Skovgaard at gravitypope

You may think that wearing enormous orange sunglasses inside over your normal glasses deducts way too many cool points to even try them. However, I can assure you that crawling across the floor in front of a coworker while vomiting actually deducts more, so the glasses could be worth it if they work. I’d try them out for you, but such accessorizing is almost as unaffordable on a grad student stipend as the shoes…

While you’re waiting for the bus

Re-post: Why do we watch Doctor Who?: A fan scholar’s perspective
It might not have much to do with the Doctor at all.

Yes, the female characters are secondary. But that’s a production decision. And fans don’t generally let production decisions get in the way when there is still something to scavenge from the show. This is the beautiful thing about fans: they don’t let creators tell them how they get to experience the show.

The Criminal Trial and Punishment of Animals: A Case Study in Shame and Necessity

Getting paid

I get three paychecks a year. I accept a little wiggle room around the dates, especially since the finance office makes it clear months in advance when I should expect to be paid. I even understand that those dates may change. But it’s pretty mean to move that date out almost an entire month with no notice whatsoever just days before the original pay date.

To add insult to injury, when I asked why my 6 month old travel reimbursement still hasn’t been processed, they told me it was so they could get out “start of semester funding” (e.g. my paycheck) in a timely fashion.

If we have to have uncertainty in the timing of some funding, shouldn’t that uncertainty be suffered by people who are more likely to be able to afford a late paycheck? Why are universities so bad at this stuff?