We are our bodies

E.O. Wilson in Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge

Without the stimulus and guidance of emotion, rational thought slows and disintegrates.  The rational mind does not float above the irrational; it cannot free itself to engage in pure reason.  There are pure theorems in mathematics but no pure thoughts that discover them.  In the brain-in-the-vat fantasy of neurobiological theory and science fiction, the organ in its nutrient bath has been detached from the impediments of the body and liberated to explore the inner universe of the mind.  But that is not what would ensue in reality.  All the evidence from the brain sciences points in the opposite direction, to a waiting coffin-bound hell of the wakened dead, where the remembered and imagined world decays until chaos mercifully grants oblivion.

Comments

  1. Mike says:

    I’ve always thought the AI attempts didn’t have enough input — i.e., without sensory ephemera constantly flooding in, any AI is likely to not exist or something we wouldn’t recognize all (which, for our purposes, is just as useless).

    What I actually want to write here is book-length, but who has time to read that? I’ve also always thought any possible AI would have emotions, as they are necessary shortcuts. Beyond a certain complexity level in this universe, there are some questions about what kind of intelligence can exist without those kind of wormholes to sagacity.

    Not quite on the topic about which you wrote, but ramifications thereof in another field.

What do you think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.