Breaking old habits: fossil fuels

Several people have told me that solar and/or windpower are useless because the amount of energy necessary to manufacture them is less than the energy they can output over the entire life of the device.  That’s uninformed nonsense.

And don’t try the “it’s too expensive” argument either because now solar is actually cheaper than coal.  Which is a very very good thing considering that if we don’t get CO2 levels down to around 350 ppm real fast, we’re in real trouble.

Wind and solar aren’t the be all and end all of clean energy either.  My city uses poop to generate power at the waste treatment plant.

Comments

  1. Justin says:

    My understanding is that nanosolar’s cost figures are press-release style projections about what their solar panels will cost when they’ve reached full production. So, perhaps veritas cum granulo salis as they say…

    The thing that I think that people don’t realize is that while for industrial or wide-spread adoption, it’s important to make the costs of renewable energy competitive, that doesn’t matter as much for personal use. Many people purchased hybrids when gas was cheap, and they weren’t making their money back. Still, it was a good idea. The same is true of solar panels, even if the costs haven’t perfectly equalized.

    On another note, I really like the cutline theme! I may use it myself.

  2. Mike says:

    Also, mass production decreases the unit cost of anything. Hard drives that cost $100,000 25 years ago now cost $80. This drastic level of change is unlikely to occur for solar and wind, but it will occur to some degree — my guess is that when true mass production occurs, solar and wind power (and their components) will drop to about a quarter of their current cost.

    This also will change things a lot.

What do you think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.