Tag-Archive for » overpopulation «

February 18th, 2010 | Author: sarcozona

I came across this adorable overload of a snow leopard at the Akron zoo frolicking in the snow.  I’m not going to tell you how many times I watched the video because then I’d have to come to terms with all of the homework I should have gotten done instead.  The zoo snow leopard is squeal-inducing-cute, unlike the visibly dangerous snow leopards on Planet Earth:

Snow leopards, like most (all?) large cats, are endangered and between population pressure, poaching, and climate change, their prospects aren’t looking good.  Maybe we should take the advice of the author of Maybe One: A Case for Smaller Families (and a bunch of other people) and consider not having kids or adopting if you want a large family.  If you live in the US, not having kids is the absolute best thing you can do for the environment:

[It] would save 9,441 tonnes of CO2 – almost six times, on average, the amount of CO2 they would emit in their own lifetime, or the equivalent of making around 2,550 return aero plane trips between London and New York. If the same American drove a more fuel-efficient car, drastically reduced his or her driving, installed energy-efficient windows, used energy-efficient lightbulbs, replaced a household refrigerator, and recycled all household paper, glass and metal, he or she would save fewer than 500 tonnes. [emphasis mine]

The enormous environmental impact is just one of the reasons I’m not planning on having children. I don’t think people shouldn’t have children, of course, but I think having children shouldn’t be expected.  I think many more people would be childless and happy if there wasn’t a constant message from society (and our mothers…) that we should settle down & have kids.

December 30th, 2009 | Author: sarcozona

I had a fantastic birthday.  I made red velvet cupcakes and someone brought a chocolate-pomegranate cheesecake that was unbelievably good (I ate the leftovers for every meal until it was gone).  Someone made me a blue coffee mug that is so pretty it makes my coffee taste better.  Then, everyone at least pretended to enjoy playing Balderdash, which is one of my very favorite games.

cupcakes

Christmas was pretty good, too.  I wore a lovely dress, so that put me in a great mood straight away.  I spent most of Christmas at my grandmother’s – via Skype.  While I wish I could have spent more time with my brother and sister, Christmas-on-Skype is way more pleasant than Christmas-in-person with my family.

I got all kinds of fantastic gifts: lemon and lime curd (time to bake scones!), lots of adorable (and warm) socks (who doesn’t like green argyle?), The Settlers of Catan (which might be more fun than Balderdash), garlic stuffed olives (I eat them by the jar), and fancy whole wheat flour that makes delicious eggnog pancakes and perfect bread.

I know you’re feeling terrifically guilty for forgetting to get me both a Christmas and a birthday present.  Luckily, you can assuage that guilt and save the world AT THE SAME TIME: Just head over to Population Connection and donate!  Population Connection is all about curbing population growth. Their work makes it clear that they understand the connection between women’s rights and reduced fertility rates.

If saving the world isn’t your thing, but you think I’m awesome, the Migraine Research Foundation is another good place to send your hard earned money.  I’d like for there to be new drugs for me to try once I get health insurance again. Or a better explanation for the root cause than “something happens and the brain stem doesn’t like it.”

If you don’t have cash to spare, but do any of your shopping online, you can still support the Migraine Research Foundation through Giving Pal.

December 23rd, 2009 | Author: sarcozona

Climate change is a big, big problem made worse by population pressure on scarce resources and strong, worldwide interdependence.  This recent article in the Guardian does a good job of connecting problems in one part of the world to those elsewhere and outlining the very large scope and scale of the disaster we’re facing.

There are many, many things we can do to make our future better and reducing our birthrate is one of the best.  Luckily, discussing this strategy is becoming less taboo.  Unfortunately, it wasn’t a topic in Copenhagen and is violently opposed by major religious groups who can’t bear to give up the idea that women are baby making machines.

I was hopeful that Copenhagen would lead to real progress.  Unfortunately, our world’s leaders couldn’t pass a binding agreement on limiting emissions and temperature increases, even to levels that are still far too high.  Goodbye, Tuvalu.

October 26th, 2009 | Author: sarcozona

E.O. Wilson in Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge:

To suppose that the living standard of the rest of the world can be raised to that of the most prosperous countries, with existing technology and current levels of consumption and waste, is a dream in pursuit of a mathematical impossibility.  Even to level out present-day income inequities would require shrinking the ecological footprints of the prosperous countries.  That is problematic in the market-based global economy, where the main players are also militarily the most powerful, and in spite of a great deal of rhetoric largely indifferent to the suffering of others.

August 29th, 2009 | Author: sarcozona

It doesn’t say anything good about our culture that sexual violence against women is eroticized and mainstream, but women choosing and enjoying sex is just too much for us.

A few songs are worth more than your life.  A lot more.  (via Michael Alan Miller) Oh, and Sweden took down pirate bay.

Well, this should change our lifestyles a bit.  Have I mentioned that overpopulation is a problem?

California is sacrificing education to prevent taxing big oil.  Wouldn’t it be awesome if our government thought just a little more long term? (via Edge of the American West)

Actually, money CAN buy happiness.

The Afghan elections weren’t fair.

Amino acids in space!

Cultural differences in interpretations of facial expressions.

Really, vaccines do not contain aborted fetal tissue.

Russia has some series race issues.

Just because change scares people doesn’t mean it should be slow.

By the way, were at war by bobster on flickr

By the way, we're at war by bobster on flickr

Music + politics = awesome

Think health care reform makes Democrats equivalent to Nazis?  Perhaps you need a quick history lesson.

Another reason to quit smoking: children pick the tobacco you smoke and it poisons them.

I really want to see this movie (via SublimeFemme):

An former health care executive comes clean. And yet another health care myth debunked.

We’re building a wall between Mexico and the US that doesn’t stop illegal immigrants, but is deadly to fragile wildlife populations.

The axolotl is about to go extinct in the wild

The axolotl is about to go extinct in the wild

American citizens in danger from chemical weapons – and they’re ours.

Iran is not a good place to be right now.

August 18th, 2009 | Author: sarcozona

The Secretary General of the UN, Ban Ki-moon, is doing his best to get countries to work together to deal with climate change, warning us that “We have four months to secure the future of our planet.” You may think that’s alarmist, and that’s what the oil companies funding “controversy” are banking on.  Yes, figuring out past and future climate is complicated, but that doesn’t mean we don’t know the climate is changing and that the effects are going to be bad.  Even groups that traditionally denied climate change are confident enough that it’s occurring to advocate for (bad) geoengineering schemes.

Some recent climate change & environmental news:

Traditional weather patterns around the world are shifting rapidly and 1 in 7 people may be a climate refugee in as little as 50 years
.

We’ve caused incredible (and deadly) algal blooms in Brittany.

We’ve made the oceans able to spawn more and deadlier hurricanes.

We’re losing many more species than we can afford.

Ecosystems are changing rapidly as some species adapt and others die out.

How to solve these problems? Consuming less is part of the solution, but reducing population is even more important.  The single best thing you can do to ensure a healthier planet and a better future for the human race is to not have children.

March 07th, 2009 | Author: sarcozona

Some of the language in this article on Chris Brown’s abuse of Rhianna is really upsetting:

a brutal argument between the singer and his girlfriend, Rihanna, provoked by her discovery of a text message from another woman. [emphasis mine]

Abuse is not a “brutal argument” and “provoked” suggests she somehow is to blame for the attack.  Unfortunately, language like this reflects many people’s attitudes about domestic violence victims.

A good article on the failure of the drug war and some better alternatives.

Women still get paid less for the same job.

Arizona lawmakers are terrified our governor might honor the state’s commitment to CO2 emissions reductions. Idiots.

We HAVE to start dealing with overpopulation. The alternatives are horrific.

Rachel Shulman explains a really cool paper on phytoplankton movement and distribution.

Christianity prolongs immaturity.

March 02nd, 2009 | Author: sarcozona

We’ve made a great big overpopulated mess of our planet and sometimes I feel like we aren’t going to take effective action before things really fall apart.  I don’t really think I’m pessimistic, because I certainly keep trying.  Perhaps this is stupid.  May Kasahara in Haruki Murakami’s The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle says this:

I’m only sixteen … and I don’t know much about the world, but I do know one thing for sure.  If I’m pessimistic, then the adults in this world who are not pessimistic are a bunch of idiots.

But I think I’d rather be an idiot than hopeless.

January 12th, 2009 | Author: sarcozona

From Jared Diamond’s Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed:

…the world’s environmental problems will get resolved, in one way or another, within the lifetimes of the children and young adults alive today.  The only question is whether they will become resolved in pleasant ways of our own choice, or in unpleasant ways not of our choice, such as warfare, genocide, starvation, disease epidemics, and collapses of societies.  While all of those grim phenomena have been endemic to humanity throughout our history, their frequency increases with environmental degredation, population pressure, and the resulting poverty and political instability.

November 28th, 2008 | Author: sarcozona

From Jared Diamond’s Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed:

The Norse were undone by the same social glue that had enabled them to master Greenland’s difficulties.  That proves to be a common theme throughout history and also in the modern world … : The values to which people cling most stubbornly under inappropriate conditions are those values that were previously the source of their greatest triumphs over adversity.

Diamond’s book is about societies that have succeeded or failed.  Population control and resource/environmental protection are key to a society’s success.  Overpopulation and environmental degredation lead almost invariably to collapse.  This is a graph of standard population growth:

Owen Davis, University of Arizona

Owen Davis, University of Arizona

It shows how a population grows over time.  At first, growth is slow, because there are few individuals reproducing, but growth speeds up as the population increases.  Eventually, growth slows and stabilizes because the population has reached the carrying capacity, that is, the environment can only support so many individuals.

This graph, however, is oversimplified.  In reality, populations often overshoot their carrying capacity and then crash – like this reindeer population:

The population also responded to the high quality and quantity of the forage on the island by increasing rapidly due to a high birth rate and low mortality. By 1963, the density of the reindeer on the island had reached 46.9 per square mile and ratios of fawns and yearlings to adult cows had dropped from 75 and 45 percent respectively, in 1957 to 60 and 26 percent in 1963. Average body weights had decreased from 1957 by 38 percent for adult females and 43 percent for adult males and were comparable to weights of reindeer in domestic herds. Lichens had been completely eliminated as a significant component of the winter diet. Sedges and grasses were expanding into sites previously occupied by lichens. In the late winter of 1963-64, in association with extreme snow accumulation, virtually the entire population of 6,000 reindeer died of starvation. [emphasis mine]

David Klein, University of Alaska

David Klein, University of Alaska

This often results in oscillations – repeating this exponential increase and population crash over and over.

This is a graph of human population growth:

It looks like the beginning of the logistic curve – or the reindeer graph.  It is very likely that we as a species have overshot our carrying capacity.  Our severe environmental problems are caused by the very large  number of people consuming resources.  But will our population decline gradually or crash?

Unlike reindeer, humans have developed many technologies to help us overcome limited resources.  Fertilizer, for example, allows us to grow more food on less land.  But ultimately, humans cannot keep reproducing indefinitely – there are not enough resources and eventually, we would simply run out of room, like bacteria in a petri dish.

Population crashes, like that in the reindeer graph, may not be that frightening on a graph, but in reality, it is horrific.  War, starvation, economic and social collapse are not the overpopulation solution I want to live through.

We must ease the burden on our planet’s resources by consuming less and changing our lifestyles.  Like Diamond makes clear in Collapse, we must also reject some of our closely held values that have led to our current situation.  Growth cannot be the sign of progress – we must instead focus on sustainability.  But even this is a temporary solution.  The reindeer ate less and less and less – and eventually starved.  We should use less, but I don’t want to use so little that life is miserable.

One of the best things we could do as a species to prevent a population crash is to have fewer children.  Many people do not want children, or did not plan to have as many as they did.  We should support people who do not wish to have children, rather than pressuring them to reproduce.  My mother asks about grandchildren often and my grandmother is also anxious for me to have kids.  But I don’t want children!  Sometimes I think I do, but then I realize that I’m just eager to make my family happy. Quite frankly, having children, especially many children, is selfish and irresponsible in our world.

What if we encouraged people to only have children if they really wanted them, and made that possible by making sure that contraceptives were readily and cheaply available?  What if people who do want children very much considered adoption before trying to have a baby?  What if we built our cities differently so that we could walk places and interacted with our neighbors more?  What if we could be part of a supportive community instead of having to create our own by having a family?

I think these what-if’s are not only possible, but necessary, if we want to live a good life.