From The Life of the Cosmos by Lee Smolin.
No wonder physics is so hard to learn. As it is usually taught to students, Newton’s physics does not make complete sense, for they are almost never told the whole story. Position, velocity, and acceleration are usually introduced as if they have simple and obvious meanings, but the do not. Even more difficult are the concepts of force and mass; the definitions given of them in textbooks are almost always circular. The students are seldom told that if they are puzzled it may be for good reason, or that the things that confuse them have been debated for centuries. Some figure it out for themselves. Many go away with an unjustified sense that they cannot learn science.
From The Life of the Cosmos by Lee Smolin.
No wonder physics is so hard to learn. As it is usually taught to students, Newton's physics does not make complete sense, for they are almost never told the whole story. Position, velocity, and acceleration are usually introduced as if they have simple and obvious meanings, but the do not. Even more difficult are the concepts of force and mass; the definitions given of them in textbooks are almost always circular. The students are seldom told that if they are puzzled it may be for good reason, or that the things that confuse them have been debated for centuries. Some figure it out for themselves. Many go away with an unjustified sense that they cannot learn science.
From The Life of the Cosmos by Lee Smolin.
Does the world consist of a large number of independently autonomous atoms, the properties of each owing nothing to the others? Or, instead, is the world a vast, interconnected system of relations, in which even the properties of a single elementary particle or the identity of a point in space requires and reflects the whole rest of the universe? The two views of space and time underlie and imply two very different views of what it means to speak of a property, of identity, or of individuality. Consequently, the transition from a cosmology based on an absolute notion of space and time to one based on a relational notion – a transition that we are now in the midst of – must have profound implications for our understanding of the place of complexity and life in the universe.
From The Life of the Cosmos by Lee Smolin.
Does the world consist of a large number of independently autonomous atoms, the properties of each owing nothing to the others? Or, instead, is the world a vast, interconnected system of relations, in which even the properties of a single elementary particle or the identity of a point in space requires and reflects the whole rest of the universe? The two views of space and time underlie and imply two very different views of what it means to speak of a property, of identity, or of individuality. Consequently, the transition from a cosmology based on an absolute notion of space and time to one based on a relational notion - a transition that we are now in the midst of - must have profound implications for our understanding of the place of complexity and life in the universe.
From The Life of the Cosmos by Lee Smolin.
[T]here is no mystery or symmetry needed to explain why the air is spread uniformly in a room. Each atom moves randomly, it is just the statistics of enormous numbers. Perhaps the greatest nightmare of the Platonist is that, in the end, all of our laws will be like this, so that the root of all the beautiful regularities we have discovered will turn out to be more statistics, beyond which is only randomness or irrationality.
This is perhaps one reason why biology seems puzzling to some physicists. The possibility that the tremendous beauty of the living world might be, in the end, just a matter of randomness, statistics, and frozen accident stands as a genuine threat to the mystical conceit that reality can be captured in a single, beautiful equation.
From The Life of the Cosmos by Lee Smolin.
[T]here is no mystery or symmetry needed to explain why the air is spread uniformly in a room. Each atom moves randomly, it is just the statistics of enormous numbers. Perhaps the greatest nightmare of the Platonist is that, in the end, all of our laws will be like this, so that the root of all the beautiful regularities we have discovered will turn out to be more statistics, beyond which is only randomness or irrationality.
This is perhaps one reason why biology seems puzzling to some physicists. The possibility that the tremendous beauty of the living world might be, in the end, just a matter of randomness, statistics, and frozen accident stands as a genuine threat to the mystical conceit that reality can be captured in a single, beautiful equation.
Chatter