Tag-Archive for » books «

March 16th, 2010 | Author: sarcozona

A few weeks ago, a friend told me he was coming over with a book that I absolutely had to read.  He showed up a few minutes later and launched immediately into a rapturous description of The Wild Trees. He wouldn’t even visit very long so that I could start reading right away.   I didn’t start reading right away and that’s a good thing – I had a test the next day and once I started reading, I couldn’t stop.

From the Institute for Redwood Ecology

The Wild Trees is about redwood research and the people that pioneered the field.  Until very recently, we had no idea what was up there and a lot of it is still a mystery.

I love popular science books, but I usually find them simply intellectually exciting and rarely get emotionally involved.  This book was different for a few reasons.  First of all, the scientists are portrayed as humans and the way their personal lives influence their professional lives (and vice versa) is a large part of the book.  So often scientists are portrayed as dull or unnaturally obsessed, but this book shows how very human we are – from the connections we have with our families, to breakups and sex, to the awe and wonder we feel when presented with something so incredible as a redwood.

And that’s the second reason this book is so different from the normal nonfiction I read: a lot of time was spent describing the trees, the forest, and the experience of climbing the trees so that their magnificence and beauty really came through.  By the end of the book, I was ready to sign up for a tree climbing class just so I could see for myself what was up there.

It was also kind of thrilling to have a sort of connection to these trees.  I work with a scientist who studies redwoods and he has cores from many of these trees.  To get a core, you use a special hollow drill to extract a bit of wood the size of a very, very long straw from a tree.  You can sand the straw flat to see the growth rings:

Redwood rings under a microscope

I don’t study redwoods now, but I learned all about dendrochronology, or tree ring science, with redwoods.  Tree rings are a fascinating archive of stress, climate, competition, and more – an autobiography of a tree, if you will.  The language may be hard to interpret, but the information is there.

Every tree that is cored is given a name and most of the time the names are dull (SP032, for example).  But redwoods are given names like Thor, Atlas, and Kronos.  I always gave the tree a personality I associated with that name as I counted and counted and counted (and counted and counted) the rings.  The Wild Trees describes the discovery of many of the trees whose cores I analyzed and what it was like to climb them, what fascinating communities live within their canopies, even human drama that occurred in their branches.  I feel honored and grateful to have learned to read the stories trees tell from such ancient and stately behemoths.

March 15th, 2010 | Author: sarcozona

From Karen Armstrong’s A History of God: The 4,000-Year Quest of Judaism, Christianity and Islam:

[T]he Christianity of the Angles, the Saxons, and the Franks was rudimentary.  They were aggressive and martial people and they wanted an aggressive religion… Soldier saints like St. George, St. Mercury and St. Demetrius figured more than God in their piety and, in practice, differed little from pagan deities.  Jesus was seen as the feudal lord of the Crusaders…: he had summoned his nights to recover his patrimony – the Holy Land – from the infidel… In practical terms, their God was still the primitive tribal deity of the early books of the Bible.  When they finally conquered Jerusalem in the summer of 1099, they fell on the Jewish and Muslim inhabitants of the city with the zeal of Joshua and massacred them with a brutality that shocked even their contemporaries.

March 08th, 2010 | Author: sarcozona

From Karen Armstrong’s A History of God: The 4,000-Year Quest of Judaism, Christianity and Islam:

Not everybody was capable of philosophical thought, however, so Falsafah was only for an intellectual elite.  It would confuse the masses and lead them into an error that imperiled their eternal salvation.  Hence the importance of the esoteric tradition, which kept these dangerous doctrines from those unfitted to receive them.  It was just the same with Sufism and the batini studies of the Ismalis; if unsuitable people attempted these mental disciplines they could become seriously ill and develop all kinds of psychological disorders.

March 01st, 2010 | Author: sarcozona

From Karen Armstrong’s A History of God: The 4,000-Year Quest of Judaism, Christianity and Islam:

Science demands the fundamental belief that there is a rational explanation for everything; it also requires an imagination and courage which are not dissimilar to religious creativity.  Like the prophet or the mystic, the scientist also forces himself to confront the dark and unpredictable realm of uncreated reality.  … [T]he scientific vision of our own day has made much classic theism impossible for many people.  To cling to the old theology is not only a failure of nerve but could involve a damaging loss of integrity. The Faylasufs attempted to wed their new [scientific] insights with mainstream Islamic faith… Yet the ultimate failure of their rational deity has something important to tell us about the nature of religious truth.

February 28th, 2010 | Author: sarcozona

I’d like to stay home this morning with my coffee and a novel, or maybe finish up some blog posts I’ve started, but not finished, in the last few weeks.  But you’ll have to wait to hear what I think about The Wild Trees, to analyze February’s migraine data, and to find out what music I’ve been particularly enamored with lately.

Because today, I’m going to work, and I’m going to stay there much later than I’d like. I’ve got a meeting tomorrow about my research, and I want to have some exciting new model runs to show off!

February 24th, 2010 | Author: sarcozona

A friend of mine recommended The Dark Tower series to me almost 7 years ago, but I’ve only recently begun reading it.  I put it off for so long partly because I’m not much of a Stephen King fan, but the first two books in the series (The Gunslinger and The Drawing of the Three) were a pleasant surprise.

The story isn’t particularly novel, but that doesn’t hurt the books.  They pull from a lot of different genres, which makes the story feel new and the world the story is set in feel both strange and familiar.  The characters, especially the main character, Roland, are very interesting.

Roland isn’t a character I can identify with at all.  It’s hard to understand how he works and why he does what he does.  And that makes him seem a bit unpredictable and is utterly fascinating.  He can be hard to like, but is very easy to respect.

I’m hoping I’ll get the third book in the series soon through swaptree.

Any thoughts from those of you who’ve read the books?

February 22nd, 2010 | Author: sarcozona

From Karen Armstrong’s A History of God: The 4,000-Year Quest of Judaism, Christianity and Islam:

The problem of predestination and free will … indicates a central difficulty in the idea of a personal God.  An impersonal God, such as Brahman, can more easily be said to exist beyond “good” and “evil,” which are regarded as masks of the inscrutable divinity.  But a God who is in some mysterious way a person and who takes an active part in human history lays himself open to criticism.  It is all too easy to make this “God” a larger-than-life tyrant or judge and make “him” fulfill our expectations.  We can turn “God” into a Republican or a socialist, a racist or a revolutionary according to our personal views.

February 15th, 2010 | Author: sarcozona

From Karen Armstrong’s A History of God: The 4,000-Year Quest of Judaism, Christianity and Islam:

Politics is not extrinsic to a Muslim’s personal religious life, as in Christianity, which mistrusts mundane success.  Muslims regard themselves as committed to implemented a just society in accord with God’s will.  The ummah has sacramental importance, as a “sign” that God has blessed this endeavor to redeem humanity from oppression and injustice; its political health holds much the same place in a Muslim’s spirituality as a particular theological option (Catholic, Protestant, Methodist, Baptist) in the life of a Christian.  If Christians find the Muslims’ regard for politics strange, they should reflect that their passion for abstruse theological debate seems equally bizarre to Jews and Muslims.

February 08th, 2010 | Author: sarcozona

From Karen Armstrong’s A History of God: The 4,000-Year Quest of Judaism, Christianity and Islam:

Nobody in the new empire was forced to accept the Islamic faith; indeed, for a century after Muhammad’s death, conversion was not encouraged and, in about 700, was actually forbidden by law: Muslims believed that Islam was for the Arabs as Judaism was for the sons of Jacob.  As the “people of the book,” … Jews and Christians were granted religious liberty as … protected minority groups.  When the Abbasid caliphs began to encourage conversion, many of the Semitic and Aryan peoples in their empire were eager to accept the new religion.

February 01st, 2010 | Author: sarcozona

From Karen Armstrong’s A History of God: The 4,000-Year Quest of Judaism, Christianity and Islam:

The image of the olive tree in [certain Koranic] verses has been interpreted as an allusion to the continuity of revelation, which springs from one “root” and branches into a multifarious variety of religious experience that cannot be identified with or confined by any one particular tradition or locality: it is neither of the East nor the West